Plus: Contrasting views of sleuths and integrity experts, the stigma of declaring AI use, and more.
Please consider making a
tax-deductible donation
to support our work.
View this email in your browser
Welcome to another edition of The RW Daily.
Know someone who would enjoy The RW Daily? They can subscribe
here
.
Researcher ‘honestly shocked’ to discover name on paper,
editor claims misunderstanding
.
Read more
Dorothy Bishop looks into "contrasting views" of sleuths and
research integrity experts
.
Read more
"How China’s universities joined the global elite," but still tally
thousands of retractions annually
.
Read more
Worthwhile Reads Elsewhere
"Fear of stigma blamed as 0.1 per cent of papers
declare AI use
."
"Will AI
Help or Hinder
Scientific Publishing?"
"Favorable research environment is a key determinant of research integrity according to a
ten-country survey across Central and Eastern Europe
."
Upcoming Talk
“
Scholarly Metrics in the Age of AI
,” featuring our Ivan Oransky (March 16, Denver)
ICYMI
Exclusive: Unrest at Wiley journal whose EIC is
cited in more than half of its papers
Announcing the Retraction Watch
Research Accountability Reporting Fellowship
Weekend Reads: Institute to stop paying fees for some OA journals; sleuths’ tips for spotting fraud; Bayer sues J&J over ‘
false and misleading claims
’
Copyright © 2026 Retraction Watch, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website.
Our mailing address is:
Retraction Watch
121 W. 36th St.
Suite 209
New York
,
NY
10018
Add us to your address book
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can
update your preferences
or
unsubscribe from this list
Share
Tweet
Forward