Welcome to another edition of The RW Daily.

Know someone who would enjoy The RW Daily? They can subscribe here.

Journal let authors make undisclosed changes that masked stolen content in paper.

Worthwhile Reads Elsewhere

“AI-generated scientific hypotheses lag human ones when put to the test," say researchers.
"Tenured scientists in the US slow down and produce less impactful work, finds study."

Upcoming Talk

"Doctors' Lounge": An evening "examining the quality control challenges that we all face in our quest to stay current as medical practitioners," featuring our Ivan Oransky (September 29, virtual)

ICYMI

‘No misconduct here’: Author defends addendum that sleuth says is ‘inadequate’

Copyright © 2025 Retraction Watch, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website.

Our mailing address is:

Retraction Watch

121 W. 36th St.

Suite 209

New York, NY 10018

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

Share

Forward