Archive and comments are only available to paid subscribers. We are grateful to paid subscribes supporting countless hours of research and advocacy. So please consider a paid subscription! Understanding the Evidence and Verdict in the Letby TrialCan the Innocent Really be Found Guilty of Serial Murder?
Lucy Letby is the British nurse who was convicted of multiple counts of murder and attempted murder of neonates being cared for at the Countess of Chester Hospital. As our regular readers will know, our colleague Scott McLachlan was one of the first academics to raise serious concerns about the evidence used in the case, even well before it ever came to court. He has published multiple detailed articles on his substack about the case. In the last year many more researchers and reporters have been raising their own concerns and, for reasons like those explained here, Scott’s pioneering work has not been properly recognised. Scott has submitted a new paper about the case for publication and the preprint is available on ResearchGate (for those who cannot access ResearchGate the pdf is below). This paper is different to his other articles as it applies Bayesian reasoning to explain why it was inevitable that Lucy Letby would be found guilty of murdering several babies by a jury while at the same time likely being innocent. The abstract:
The paper can be downloaded here:
You’re currently a free subscriber to ‘Where are the numbers?’ For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. |